In the realm of advocacy, influence refers to the ability to affect or sway opinions, decisions, policies, and behaviours in alignment with the goals and objectives of the advocacy campaign.
It involves the strategic use of communication, persuasion, and engagement to bring about change in the attitudes or actions of individuals, communities, policymakers, or institutions. Influencing in advocacy is often achieved through compelling storytelling, evidence-based arguments, grassroots mobilisation, and effective communication strategies. Successful advocacy requires a nuanced understanding of how to navigate and leverage influence across various channels and stakeholders.
Trying to influence political actors, also known as (political) mobilisation, always involves some risk, and in campaign work, tailoring approaches to specific situations is crucial. Choosing the right activities is vital. For example, public action tends to be confrontational, so it’s important to evaluate relationships with policymakers before using it. Starting with a confrontational activity without an established relationship can be detrimental. In such cases, opting for an advisory approach is often wiser. If non-confrontational methods don’t work, there’s flexibility to shift towards more confrontational strategies later. A scale of influence in advocacy tactics can help.
Non-confrontational tools are on the left, and more confrontational ones are on the right. This scale guides understanding of the different levels of risk and influence in advocacy efforts. Here’s a breakdown of each tactic on the scale beginning from negotiation into confrontation:
Activity Type | Description | Example | Tips |
---|---|---|---|
Budget Tracking | Monitoring and analysing financial allocations and expenditures. | Advocacy groups tracking government spending to ensure funds are allocated to social programs. | Use accessible language and visuals to communicate findings to a broader audience. |
Collaborative Problem Solving | Working jointly with decision-makers to identify and address issues. | Collaborating with local government on community development plans. | Emphasize shared goals and focus on finding common ground. |
Roundtable Session | Facilitating a structured discussion among stakeholders. | Bringing together diverse voices to discuss environmental policy. | Ensure representation from all relevant perspectives. |
Expert Meeting | Convening specialists to provide insights and advice. | Gathering scientists and researchers to discuss climate change policy. | Use expert opinions to bolster evidence-based arguments. |
Evidence Position Paper | Crafting a document presenting detailed evidence and recommendations. | Producing a paper on the economic impact of a proposed policy. | Make the information accessible to policymakers and the public. |
Topic-Based Reception | Hosting an event to discuss a specific issue with decision-makers. | Organizing a reception to discuss education reform with legislators. | Create an inviting atmosphere for open conversations. |
Youth Consultations | Seeking input and perspectives from young individuals on policy issues. | Consulting with students on educational policies. | Empower youth to actively participate and express their views. |
Social Media Campaign | Utilizing online platforms to raise awareness and advocate for change. | Running a Twitter campaign to promote environmental conservation. | Leverage visuals, hashtags, and user-generated content for engagement. |
Petition | Collecting signatures to demonstrate public support or opposition. | Petitioning against the construction of a controversial project. | Clearly state the issue and call to action to encourage participation. |
Press Conference/Media Release | Addressing the media to disseminate information and advocate. | Holding a press conference to announce a campaign’s findings. | Prepare key messages and ensure media coverage. |
Protest/March/Demonstration | Organizing public gatherings to express support or dissent. | Participating in a march for racial equality. | Coordinate with local authorities to ensure a peaceful event. |
Sit-In/Vigil | Nonviolent occupation or silent demonstration. | Holding a sit-in to protest discriminatory policies. | Plan logistics and communicate objectives clearly. |
Strike | Organized withdrawal of labour to influence policies or conditions. | Workers striking for fair wages and better working conditions. | Coordinate with affected parties and maintain clear communication. |
Boycott | Refraining from supporting or using products or services. | Boycotting companies associated with unethical practices. | Clearly communicate the reasons for the boycott to the public. |
Lawsuit | Legal action taken to challenge or influence policies. | Filing a lawsuit against a government policy deemed unconstitutional. | Ensure legal standing and gather strong legal representation. |
Each tactic comes with its strengths, challenges, and considerations, and the choice depends on the specific context and goals of the advocacy campaign.
Crafting a strategic approach to selecting tactics involves navigating the complex landscape of political actors and their stance toward your cause. Utilizing a decision matrix, where the two key factors are the political actor’s support or opposition to the cause and their status as allies or non-allies, can provide a structured guide for decision-making.
By strategically aligning tactics with the political actor’s stance and alliance status, campaigners can optimize their efforts, effectively communicate their message, and navigate the complexities of advocacy with a purposeful and adaptable approach.